A Note on Hypocrisy

A couple of really interesting comments have rolled in regarding my post Saturday about Sarah Palin and the circumstances in which I think a candidate’s sexual history is appropriate to discuss. A few people brought up the issue of hypocrisy, arguing that when a candidate is a vocal opponent of other people’s sexual liberty, their own sexual past should be on the table.

Christine O'Donnell (image: thewire.com/sheknows)

I get the instinct to throw hypocrisy in the faces of the blowhards. Few things are more frustrating than abstinence-only proponents with laundry lists of premarital partners, gay marriage opponents who secretly solicit gay sex, or general sex-negativity from sexters extraordinaire.

After careful consideration, I’m not willing to add a fourth category to my earlier list of three (abuse of power, broken laws, misuse of office resources). I feel that dragging anybody‘s sexual history through the muck for political gain condones the general use of promiscuity, perceived promiscuity, non-traditional sexuality, etc. for political point-scoring, and I’m not okay with that. As much as I enjoy watching conservative politicians squirm when their “indiscretions” are aired (not that dems don’t squirm, they do; I just don’t enjoy it as much), I’m hoping for a political stage where this shit is off limits.

One reader (hit me up if you want a citation!) said these discussions at least serve the purpose of “showing that there’s no such thing as people who actually fit into a normative sexuality.” I wish that I believed that these sorts of revelations encouraged people to think more expansively about what “normal” is, but I really don’t think it does. I think the “offenders” get shoved through a media circus and then get pushed offstage for someone with a more “pure” record (even if it’s quickly debunked.) I’d rather that the political conversation exclude children, spouses, high school transcripts, adolescent pot smoking, etc. and focus on policy, problem-solving, and compromise. But hey, that’s just me, and it turns out a sex scandal sells a lot of magazines.

Related Post: Gay marriage in the media: soul-splintering panic and emotional distress.

Related Post: Victim blaming from judges, of all people.

Advertisements

7 Comments

Filed under Media, Politics, Sex

7 responses to “A Note on Hypocrisy

  1. this is so good i want to read it out-loud…you say what i’ve been saying for years only with more eloquence! đŸ˜€

  2. Pingback: How I Wish the Warren/Brown Showdown Had Occurred | rosiesaysblog

  3. Pingback: “With a Dot on His Forehead” | rosiesaysblog

  4. Pingback: The Art Project Candidate | rosiesaysblog

  5. Pingback: The Sexperience 1000 (I promise I did not come up with that name) | rosiesaysblog

  6. Pingback: “Those boundaries end outside of one’s bedroom door” | rosiesaysblog

  7. Pingback: The Most Self-Aggrandizing Post Yet | rosiesaysblog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s