Tag Archives: Senate

S(Monday) Scraps 105

Screenshot_7_1_13_1_49_PM-2

1. TEXAS: This is a long and beautiful piece by Amy Gentry for The Rumpus about abortion, body politics, and who we’re really protecting.

2. BADASS: Senator Claire McCaskill replies to James Taranto’s horrifying essay about how the fight against sexual assault in the military is actually a “war on men” and male sexuality. Taranto: 0, McCaskill: ALL OF THE POINTS.

3. TRAVEL: Fascinating essay by travel writer Simon Winchester about a tiny island of 300 people, Tristan de Cunha, and how he got banned from visiting for violating local customs.

4. HISTORY: In the wake of the gutting of the Voting Rights Act, Slate has an example of the dizzyingly confusing literacy tests that were used in the 50s and 60s to prevent black people from voting.

5. PLANNED PARENTHOOD: In case you ever forget what Planned Parenthood provides, a lovely essay from the blog What Are You Doing Here, Are You Lost?

6. CITIES: Chicago Magazine has an awesome series of panoramic shots of New York, San Francisco, Chicago, pre- and during industrial development.

Related Post: Sunday 104 – Books in pie-chart form, awesome ASL translators, what is a bro?

Related Post: Sunday 103 – Awesome people reading, pin-up presidents, Rich Kids of Instagram

2 Comments

Filed under Art, Body Image, Chicago, Gender, Politics, Really Good Writing by Other People

Rob Portman Part 2

On Monday, I wrote about Senator Rob Portman’s change of heart on marriage equality. I was (am) very frustrated that it took having a gay son to get him to see the light. That said, a lot of people on the internet and in real life have been making some excellent points about parenting, political motivation, and basic human psychology. I think we have too low expectations of our political representatives. Anyway, I stand by what I wrote, with some asterisks.

I expanded on those asterisks in a more formal (hopefully more nuanced) piece for Role/Reboot

Screenshot_3_20_13_9_51_AM

Related Post: That time I met a Republican

Related Post: Do you hope your child will be straight?

1 Comment

Filed under Gender, Politics, Republished!

So How About That

More tomorrow on the election in general, but for now let’s talk about Tammy Baldwin.

She was the one who got me started with the crying.

I’ve been doing a lot of reading at work about corporate diversity and inclusion initiatives, and the idea I keep coming back to is bringing one’s “whole self” to work.

What does it do to people when they feel like they can’t post a photo of their family, or talk about their personal lives, or speak with their real voices? How can you truly contribute if a piece of your brain is worried about letting slip the wrong pronoun?

There was a generation, no… several generations, who had to choose between being themselves and becoming a public servant. The election of Tammy Baldwin, the first openly gay senator, is another crushing blow to that Chinese wall that queer Americans have had to create between their personal lives and their professional lives.

Fuck, sometimes America is pretty alright.

Related Post: When NYC passed marriage equality.

Related Post: Andrew Sullivan on marriage equality.

1 Comment

Filed under Gender, Politics

“Oh Wait… That Was Me.”

I am officially out of energy, and it is…. 8:52 in the morning. This bodes well, don’t you think? So here, it’s a parody of Elizabeth Warren’s announcement. How could that not be fun?

Related Post: My thoughts on pettiness of the Warren/Brown “NakedGate.” Sigh.

Related Post: More YouTube awesomesauce…Vag Magazine.

Leave a comment

Filed under Media, Politics

How I Wish the Warren/Brown Showdown Had Occurred

Elizabeth Warren

Here’s what happened: Elizabeth Warren is running against Scott Brown for the Massachusetts Senate seat. We all I know I have a big crush on her and that I’m contemplating moving back east just to vote for her (not really). At a Senate primary debate, the moderator mentioned that Brown had partially paid for law school by posing nude in Cosmopolitan and asked the candidates how they had afforded their educations. Elizabeth Warren joked, “I kept my clothes on.”

The next day, in response to Warren’s joke, Scott Brown said “Thank God!” on a morning talk show. This is how a firestorm starts.

People are all up on Scott Brown for denigrating the appearance of Elizabeth Warren, and yeah.. he kind of deserves it. It’s a fratty, sophomoric jab that undermines Warren’s qualifications by focusing attention on her looks. But, and it pains me to say this, Elizabeth Warren was kind of asking for it. The premise of the moderator’s stupid question was that paying for Brown’s education by very legal albeit potentially embarrassing methods is somehow relevant to Brown’s candidacy. It’s not. Elizabeth Warren knows it’s not, but she validated the premise of the question by distancing herself from Brown’s history with her “clothes on” joke. She’s way too smart for this crap.

Imagine the situation were reversed. A woman poses for Maxim in college to help foot the bills. 20+ years later, she runs for office much to the guffaws of her constituents. She wins. Four years later, a male opponent is asked about his college bills, and he says “I kept my clothes on.” Sexist, right? And irrelevant! We’d be up in arms! At least, I know I would.

The real villain in this scenario is whoever wrote that ridiculous question. If you’re trying to ask about the very real, tangible concern of the rising cost of college, then ask that. If you’re trying to understand the lengths that American families have to go to in order to put their kids through UMass, then ask that. Don’t dredge up this shit. It’s a waste of everybody’s time, and it condones the inclusion of personal, legal decisions that candidates made decades ago into their qualifications for office.

When Elizabeth Warren got that question, I wish she had taken the high road and skipped the joke. In fact, I wish the question hadn’t been asked. I wish that everyone in this scenario behaved like adults on whom rests the well being of real families and their communities. This is some high school bullshit, and I expect more of both of them.

Related Post: Why I don’t care who Sarah Palin banged in 1987.

Related Post: A note on why I don’t think sexual hypocrisy justifies the airing of private business.

11 Comments

Filed under Gender, Media, Politics, Sex

Elizabeth Warren in Two Minutes

Reasons I want to move back to Massachusetts:

1. It’d be nice to see my family more often.

2. I want to vote for Elizabeth Warren for Senate.

She’s currently on her talking tour around the state raising dough and name recognition in her bid to take on Scott Brown. Hot damn, this is going to be an interesting race. Brown is popular, and the part of Massachusetts between Boston and and Smith College isn’t as bright blue as the state’s voting record would suggest.

I can’t wait for debate season, just watch this clip. Girlface is on fire (just wait for the :52 mark):

It’s also a really great counter argument to the pull-yourself-up-by-your-bootstraps mentality that folks opposing social services and public works tend to project. It goes like this, “I didn’t need help, I made my own money, why should I pay for you lazy jerks?” Warren points out the foundational structures that support everybody’s business, no matter how brilliant and entrepreneurial.

“You built a factory out there? Good for you. But I want to be clear: you moved your goods to market on the roads the rest of us paid for; you hired workers the rest of us paid to educate; you were safe in your factory because of police forces and fire forces that the rest of us paid for.

My favorite line (and everybody else’s): “There is nobody in this country who got rich on his own. Nobody.”

Absentee ballot? Hmmmmmm….

Related Post: Another viral youtube clip, Zach Wahls on gay marriage.

Related Post: Sheryl Sandberg says “Lean in.”

6 Comments

Filed under Media, Politics